Papers

Geometry from local flatness in Lorentzian spin foam theories

Local flatness is a property shared by all the spin foam models. It ensures that the theory’s fundamental building blocks are flat by requiring locally trivial parallel transport. In the context of simplicial Lorentzian spin foam theory, we show that local flatness is the main responsible for the emergence of geometry independently of the details of the spin foam model. We discuss the asymptotic analysis of the EPRL spin foam amplitudes in the large quantum number regime, highlighting the interplay with local flatness.

Constructive Axiomatics in Spacetime Physics Part II: Constructive Axiomatics in Context

The Ehlers-Pirani-Schild (EPS) constructive axiomatisation of general relativity, published in 1972, purports to build up the kinematical structure of that theory from only axioms which have indubitable empirical content. It is, therefore, of profound significance both to the epistemology and to the metaphysics of spacetime theories. In this article, we set the EPS approach in its proper context, by (a) discussing the history of constructive approaches to spacetime theories in the lead-up to EPS; (b) addressing some of the major concerns raised against EPS; (c) considering how EPS compares with ‘chronometric’ approaches to affording the metric field of general relativity its operational significance; (d) distinguishing quite generally between different kinds of constructive approach, and fitting EPS into this classification; (e) discussing how constructivism bears on a number of other issues in the foundations of physics; and (f) assessing the merits of constructivism qua local foundationalist project. There are two companion papers, in which we provide a pedagogical walkthrough to the EPS axiomatisation (Part I), and discuss/develop versions of EPS with quantum mechanical inputs (Part III).

On the Role of Fiducial Structures in Minisuperspace Reduction and Quantum Fluctuations in LQC

We study the homogeneous minisuperspace reduction within the canonical framework for a scalar field theory and gravity. Symmetry reduction is implemented via second class constraints for the field modes over a partitioning of the non-compact spatial slice $Sigma$ into disjoint cells. The canonical structure of the resulting homogeneous theories is obtained via the associated Dirac bracket which can only be defined on a finite number of cells homogeneously patched together and agrees with the full theory Poisson bracket for the averaged fields. This identifies a finite region $V_o$, the fiducial cell, whose size $L$ sets the physical scale over which homogeneity is imposed, namely a wavelength cutoff. The reduced theory results from 1) selecting a subset of $V_o$-averaged observables of the full theory; 2) neglecting inhomogeneous $vec kneqmathbf0$ modes with wavelengths $lambdageq L$ and $lambda< L$; 3) neglecting boundary terms encoding interactions between neighbouring cells. The error made is of order $mathcal O(1/kL)$. As a result, the off-shell structures of the reduced theory depend on the size of $V_o$ and different $V_o$ identify canonically inequivalent theories whose dynamics though is $V_o$-independent. Their quantisation leads then to a family of $V_o$-labeled quantum representations and the quantum version of an active rescaling of $V_o$ is implemented via a suitable dynamics-preserving isomorphism between the different theories. We discuss the consequences for statistical moments, fluctuations, and semiclassical states in both a standard and polymer quantisation. For a scalar field of mass $m$, we also sketch the quantum reduction and identify a subsector of the QFT where the results of the"first reduced, then quantised" theories can be reproduced with good approximation as long as $mgg1/L$. Finally, a strategy to include inhomogeneities in cosmology is outlined.

How causation is rooted into thermodynamics

The notions of cause and effect are widely employed in science. I discuss why and how they are rooted into thermodynamics. The entropy gradient (i) explains in which sense interventions affect the future rather than the past, and (ii) underpins the time orientation of the subject of knowledge as a physical system. Via these two distinct paths, it is this gradient, and only this gradient, the source of the time orientation of causation, namely the fact the cause comes before its effects.

Experimental superposition of time directions

In the macroscopic world, time is intrinsically asymmetric, flowing in a specific direction, from past to future. However, the same is not necessarily true for quantum systems, as some quantum processes produce valid quantum evolutions under time reversal. Supposing that such processes can be probed in both time directions, we can also consider quantum processes probed in a coherent superposition of forwards and backwards time directions. This yields a broader class of quantum processes than the ones considered so far in the literature, including those with indefinite causal order. In this work, we demonstrate for the first time an operation belonging to this new class: the quantum time flip. Using a photonic realisation of this operation, we apply it to a game formulated as a discrimination task between two sets of operators. This game not only serves as a witness of an indefinite time direction, but also allows for a computational advantage over strategies using a fixed time direction, and even those with an indefinite causal order.

Quantum Euler angles and agency-dependent spacetime

Quantum gravity is expected to introduce quantum aspects into the description of reference frames. Here we set the stage for exploring how quantum gravity induced deformations of classical symmetries could modify the transformation laws among reference frames in an effective regime. We invoke the quantum group $SU_q(2)$ as a description of deformed spatial rotations and interpret states of a representation of its algebra as describing the relative orientation between two reference frames. This leads to a quantization of one of the Euler angles and to the new paradigm of agency-dependence: space is reconstructed as a collection of fuzzy points, exclusive to each agent, which depends on their choice of reference frame. Each agent can choose only one direction in which points can be sharp, while points in all other directions become fuzzy in a way that depends on this choice. Two agents making different choices will thus observe the same points with different degrees of fuzziness.

Witnessing the non-objectivity of an unknown quantum dynamics

Quantum Darwinism offers an explanation for the emergence of classical objective features — those we are used to at macroscopic scales — from quantum properties at the microscopic level. The interaction of a quantum system with its surroundings redundantly proliferates information to many parts of the environment, turning it accessible and objective to different observers. But given that one cannot probe the quantum system directly, only its environment, how to witness whether an unknown quantum property can be deemed objective or not? Here we propose a probabilistic framework to analyze this question and show that objectivity implies a Bell-like inequality. Among several other results, we show quantum violations of this inequality, a device-independent proof of the non-objectivity of quantum correlations that give rise to the phenomenon we name “collective hallucination”: observers probing distinct parts of the environment can agree upon their measurement outcome of a given observable but such outcome can be totally uncorrelated from the property of the quantum system that fixed observable should be probing. We also implement an appealing photonic experiment where the temporal degree of freedom of photons is the quantum system of interest, while their polarization acts as the environment. Employing a fully black-box approach, we achieve the violation of a Bell inequality, thus certifying the non-objectivity of the underlying quantum dynamics in a fully device-independent framework.

Experimental demonstration of input-output indefiniteness in a single quantum device

At the fundamental level, the dynamics of quantum fields is invariant under the combination of time reversal, charge conjugation, and parity inversion. This symmetry implies that a broad class of effective quantum evolutions are bidirectional, meaning that the exchange of their inputs and outputs gives rise to valid quantum evolutions. Recently, it has been observed that quantum theory is theoretically compatible with a family of operations in which the roles of the inputs and outputs is indefinite. However, such operations have not been demonstrated in the laboratory so far. Here we experimentally demonstrate input-output indefiniteness in a photonic setup, demonstrating an advantage in a quantum game and showing incompatibility with a definite input-output direction by more than 69 standard deviations. Our results establish input-output indefiniteness as a new resource for quantum information protocols, and enable the table-top simulation of hypothetical scenarios where the arrow of time could be in a quantum superposition.

Witnessing superpositions of causal orders by weak measurements at a given time

The questions we raise in this letter are as follows: What is the most general representation of a quantum state at a single time? Can we adapt the current representations to the scenarios in which the order of quantum operations are coherently or incoherently superposed? If so, what is the relation between the state at a given time and the uncertainty in the order of events before and after it? By establishing the relationship of two-state vector formalism with pseudo-density operators, we introduce the notion of single-time pseudo-state which can be constructed by either ideal or weak measurements. We show that the eigenspectrum in the latter case enables us to discriminate between the coherent and incoherent superpositions of causal orders in which the pre- and post-selection measurements are interchanged with a non-zero probability. Finally, we discuss some of the possible experimental realizations in existing photonic setups.